Thanks for that, I have not read anything on this exe, does it have the same syntax for filters and the like? Javier -----Original Message----- From: ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ulf Lamping Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:12 PM To: Ethereal user support Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] writing to disk process Torres, Javier wrote: > Thanks for your answer Guy, > What I am worried about is dropping data from the time I get the packet > in tshark to the time it actually writes to disk. Because of this I am > trying to find a way to test and see if I received all the packets > Tshark sees on the capture. I had thought this app was looking at the > interface so once it processed the information from the interface it > would at that point write the data to disk. > > Since you are saying it is writing to disk at the same time it is > looking at it, this makes the job of making sure I am not dropping > packets more difficult. > > The setup currently that I run is: > Tshark -I 15 -n -B 20 -w capture_`date +%m%d%Y`.pcap -b filesize:20000 > > /dev/null & > > This takes whatever comes in on that interface and drops it into a file. > > I was hoping to make sure the packets it is writing don't get dropped in > the time it takes them to write to disk since it is sensitive > information we are gathering. > > > May I suggest you use dumpcap instead of tshark? It was build for the purpose you describe and will do less processing with the packet data. Regards, ULFL _______________________________________________ Ethereal-users mailing list Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
Powered by MHonArc 2.6.10