On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 15:50 +0800, Jeff Morriss wrote: > Erwin Rol wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:06 -0500, Gerald Combs wrote: > > [...] > > > All with all I think it is very disappointing how this was and still is > > handled, it some how seems that core-developers distrust the other > > developers and users. > > I have to admit I was little shocked at first, too. But I also doubt > Gerald and crew have meant to offend anyone nor do they distrust the > other developers and users. I doubt that too, but sometimes certain actions are hard to explain without the right information. > One problem that sometimes arises, I think, > is that if the leader of an open project such as this one starts a > discussion in a public forum about a name change or fork or whatever a > massive discussion ensues with everyone and their brother offering an > opinion. And that is a bad thing ? I think that's a vital part of a FOSS project. The leaders also don't reject the help of those people. At least informing the people would have giving them a choice to build an opinion on the topic. > That's all fine and good but if the leader has already made up > his or her mind about it then everyone has just wasted their breath > and/or gets even more upset when the leader makes the change because > they think the leader has ignored their opinion. Well the leader _did_ ignore all opinions, actually he ignored them so bad that he didn't even bother ask for opinions. > In the end, the > project isn't a democracy. People can discuss it before the change (if > it's announced beforehand) or after the change (as we are now), but how > much does it really matter which case is taken? so we should only "pay our tax" and shut up ? This is a great way to cause a fork of a project. So maybe instead of discussing a decision that is force onto us, we maybe should now discusses on how we can prevent that the project changes its name every time Gerald gets a new job, or otherwise has a bad day. - Erwin
Powered by MHonArc 2.6.10