On 2/6/06, ethereal@xxxxxxxxxx <ethereal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have noticed in some of my experiments that the packet timestamp in > Ethereal is not very accurate. For example, when packets are arriving > rapidly, the timestamp in Ethereal is sometimes identical (to the > micro-second) over 10-20 packets. > [snip] > Can someone explain the source of the inaccuracy? And perhaps some ideas > for improvement? The kernel provides timestamps that are in miliseconds. So that's what ethereal gets. -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan
Powered by MHonArc 2.6.10