You had said client. I'm guessing their ISP isn't doing what their help desk calls "port 25 blocking"? McAfee 8.0 has a "port blocking" feature that may be turned on by default actually. If they are using other anti-virus softwares, I've seen like a virtual port (for lack of a better term) get created to send mail. Message: 11 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 11:27:10 -0500 From: James Garrison <jhg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [Ethereal-users] Capture Filter on port - strange behavior To: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <427A495E.7020901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Running on Windows XP SP2 with Ethereal versions 0.10.10 and WinPCap 3.0. If I provide the following capture filter: port 25 in order to capture an SMTP transaction, I see only packets with destination port 25 -- I.e. I see the the client's outgoing packets only. However, if I capture with NO filter specified, I see all packets, so I know WinPCap is capturing all the traffic. I also tried src port 25 || dst port 25 but the results were the same. This used to work just fine. Has something changed or am I missing something? I also tried Ethereal 0.10.9 and WinPCap 3.1beta4 with the same results. -- James Garrison Athens Group, Inc. mailto:jhg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 5608 Parkcrest Dr http://www.athensgroup.com Austin, TX 78731 PGP: RSA=0x92E90A3B DH/DSS=0x498D331C (512) 345-0600 x150 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ethereal-users mailing list Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users End of Ethereal-users Digest, Vol 25, Issue 7 ********************************************* -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.5 - Release Date: 5/4/05
Powered by MHonArc 2.6.10