Forgot to cc: this to the list... On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:51:50 -0800, Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If by "decoded" you mean "displayed as a sequence number or ack number", > that's not by design - and the only obvious thing I can see in the code > that would cause it would be the requirement that the entire TCP header > (not counting options) be present in the packet. Is that the problem? That's what I meant, yes. Thank you for the clarification. :) Is sequence number analysis even needed in this case? It would be sufficient just to translate the value into decimal notation and display it, at least for my purposes. -- Bjorn Townsend | eriktown@xxxxxxxxx
Powered by MHonArc 2.6.10