On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:40:37AM +0200, PELLE Thierry FTRD/DAC/ISS wrote: > I have an ethernet link transporting two 802.1q VLAN frames. I would > like to capture with one ethernet card and ethereal, but I can't manage > to do it? "Can't" in what sense? Do the packets not show up? Are you sniffing on the raw Ethernet device, or on a VLAN device? On what OS are you running Ethereal? The page at http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear/vlan.html seems to imply that, on Linux, older versions of the VLAN software described on that page may not have handled raw packet capture as well as they should have: Change Log Release 1.6 (gz) For Kernel: 2.4.14+ March 24, 2002: Removed 2.4 kernel patch: It's in the standard kernel now. Updated vconfig to fix some compile issues, and enable cross-compilation to the StrongARM platform (changes should help other cross-compile attempts too.) Release 1.5 (gz) For Kernel: 2.4.12-pre5 October 22, 2001: Mostly added other peoples fixes and patches (thanks folks!) Finally fixed mc-list leakage (Ard van Breemen) Flush mc-list at vlan-destory (Ard van Breemen) Add vconfig man page to distribution (Ard van Breemen) Fix problem with /proc and renaming VLAN devices (af AT devcon D.T net) Add relatively large change by Nick Eggelston that makes VLAN devices more transparent to tools like tcpdump and other raw packet snoopers. This will only be enabled when the REORDER_HDR flag is set. See also: http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-users/200104/msg00022.html http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-users/200104/msg00023.html However, those messages (and the message I quoted in the second of those) seem to describe the VLAN problems as bad packets being captured, rather than as *no* packets being captured, so if you're not seeing VLAN packets at all, it's probably a different problem.
Powered by MHonArc 2.6.10