> This time, I've captured all the packets, but the ARP reply still comes > 0.3ms (this delay is very small!) before the request. Could this be a > problem of the data capture? It is just possible that the different paths through the operating system give you that sort of timeing error. > And capturing all the packets, I've realized that in this LAN there are > a lot of ARP requests without reply. In fact, the only ARP replies I've > found in the network are the replies directed to my computer. (And I do > capture the packets in promiscuous mode) But are you on a switching hub? (http://www.ethereal.com/faq.html#q4.1) I strongly suspect that you are. Can you find an example of a packet with both source and destination addresses which are not your machine and are not "broadcast"? > Besides that, the ARP requests that my computer produce have only 46 > bytes and the other ARP requests have only 60 bytes, which is bellow > the Ethernet packet minimum length. And no packet has the Ethernet CRC. This sounds like Capture->Start->CaptureLength is set to a low value. Set it to 65535 unless you've got a good reason not to. Check: in the middle pane, the first line contains the text "(x on wire, y captured)" x and y should be the same number. -- Richard Urwin, Software Design Engineer Schenck Test Automation Braemar Court, 1311b Melton Road, Syston, UK. rurwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________
Powered by MHonArc 2.6.10