On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 09:42 +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote: > Hi Erwin, > > Please see this reply on similar questions by John Please note that you didn't answer a single question the first time and didn't answer a single question this time. > a) Ethereal(R) (the name) is ultimately owned by NIS Inc. Gerald couldn't > hang on to that name, so he renamed the program. What NIS Inc. is doing > with the name and the program is unknown. This is not an answer on why the fork was done, why it was done in a non-public way. It only answered a own created naming problem. > b) Ethereal is 'dead in the water' (ready to be eaten by a shark :) ) > All core developers went to work on Wireshark, since they feel that is > where the work continues. They have no more base to call home at > ethereal.com. All core-developers, seemed to have forgotten their user base and non-core developers! > Now it's just a matter of working the user community to come over the > www.wireshark.org and enjoy the same fuzzy feeling. ;) Yes Sir! The core-developers wish is our command! > > First of all still nobody answered the questions people have on the why > > this was done, just because Gerald got a new job is no reason. > > > > So what is the reason of this change? Not answered! > > Than it is good to know that all non-core-developers, those that only > > help with pity little things like bug fixing and one or two little > > dissectors, are not important enough to be informed about this before it > > happens. > > It would be interesting to know who those core-developers are, and who > > is that "one notable exception" ? Not answered! > > Also as mentioned by someone else, it might be a good idea to put a > > explanation on www.ethereal.com. Not done!
Powered by MHonArc 2.6.10