Re: [Ethereal-dev] Patch for UDP header length

[Graeme Hewson <ghewson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ulf Lamping wrote:

> Hi Graeme!
>
> Just wanted you to know, that the usage of hidden fields is deprecated 
> for some time, and shouldn't be used in new code.
>
> This is because hidden fields have some serious usability problem.
>
> It's better to use a tree for this, so the user will see the available 
> fields and can build a corresponding filter string even if the field in 
> question is currently not "valid".
>
> Regards, ULFL

Ulf, if you mean the call to proto_tree_add_uint_hidden(), I did wonder 
about that, but all I'm doing is modifying the existing code.  I have a 
case where the UDP header Length field is longer than it should be 
(which I don't feel able to share), and my patch simply warns about that.