Re: [Ethereal-dev] UDP dissector with unknown port

[Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Oct 5, 2003, at 10:16 PM, Tomas Kukosa wrote:

> I think better than
> dissector_add("udp.port", 0, xxx_handle);
> is
> dissector_add_handle("udp.port", xxx_handle);

Yes, the latter is the preferred way of registering the XXX dissector 
as a protocol for a dissector that runs atop a particular protocol, but 
that doesn't have a fixed "port" (selector) value for that protocol, 
and that isn't a heuristic dissector for that protocol (which means you 
need to use "Decode As..." or "-d" to use it).