Re: [Ethereal-dev] Modification to packet-tns.c

[Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 05:00:20PM +0100, Bernd Becker wrote:
> The attached capture shows a REDIRECT packet with a capture length
> of 118 bytes, where the port number was truncated and would be
> interpreted as 104 instead of 1047.

It also has a HOST= item; should the redirection handler use that rather
than the source address of the redirect when creating a conversation?