On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 10:47:35PM -0500, dheitmueller wrote: > Is there any way to get Ethereal to interpret the "file data" field as > DCE/RPC? Yes. Fix the bug that's causing it not to realize that the write is to a pipe over which DCE RPC stuff is being done. :-) See the "is this part of DCERPC over SMB reassembly?" code in "dissect_write_andx_request()"; it appears that the hash table lookup in the "si->ct->dcerpc_fid_to_frame" table isn't finding anything. I *suspect* the problem is that it's expecting the first part of a DCE RPC-over-SMB call to be in an Transaction SMB; however, in this case we have: frame 3 - Transaction SMB request from .80 to .71, containing the Bind frame 4 - Transaction SMB reply from .71 to .80, containing the Bind_ack frame 5 - Write andX request from .80 to .71, presumably containing an AUTH3 or something such as that, *NOT* a continuation of the Bind or the Bind_ack Frame 6 - Write andX from .71 to .80, replying to that write Frame 7 - Transaction SMB request from .80 to .71, containing a GetDomainPasswordInfo request Frame 8 - Transaction SMB reply from .71 to .80, containing a GetDomainPasswordInfo reply and so on, so the write isn't a continuation of a Transaction operation. Perhaps once we identify a FID as referring to a pipe over which DCE RPC stuff is being done, we need to treat *everything* written to that pipe as pipe stuff.
Powered by MHonArc 2.6.10