Ethereal: Re: [Ethereal-dev] stricter GCC (was: Re: [Patch] iostat win32 build)

Ethereal-dev: December 2002

Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] stricter GCC (was: Re: [Patch] iostat win32 build)
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 02:41:16 +0100

gcc 3.2 complains about this problem by default.

  Ciao
     Jörg
--
Joerg Mayer                                          <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
I found out that "pro" means "instead of" (as in proconsul). Now I know
what proactive means.

References:
- [Ethereal-dev] [Patch] iostat win32 build
  - From: Jason House
- RE: [Ethereal-dev] [Patch] iostat win32 build
  - From: Graham Bloice
- Re: [Ethereal-dev] [Patch] iostat win32 build
  - From: Guy Harris
- [Ethereal-dev] stricter GCC (was: Re: [Patch] iostat win32 build)
  - From: Jason House
- Re: [Ethereal-dev] stricter GCC (was: Re: [Patch] iostat win32 build)
  - From: John McDermott
- Re: [Ethereal-dev] stricter GCC (was: Re: [Patch] iostat win32 build)
  - From: Guy Harris

Prev by Date: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Solution to windows building?
Next by Date: [Ethereal-dev] cpp warnings in packet-prism.c
Previous by thread: Re: [Ethereal-dev] stricter GCC (was: Re: [Patch] iostat win32 build)
Next by thread: Re: [Ethereal-dev] [Patch] iostat win32 build
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread