On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 10:29:42AM +1100, Brad Hards wrote: > 3. PTR records are used a lot, and I noted a redundant "ptr" label that looked > ugly and didn't provide any extra information. Why is that different from the "addr" label in the summary line for A records? Presumably that's redundant as well, as A records have only an address in them, just as PTR records have only a name in them. Perhaps other record types that have only one item should be cleaned up as well. > Can someone have a look at this, and commit it if OK? Done. > Future: LLMNR and DNS are probably going to diverge a bit. It may be useful to > split the DNS code into two dissectors, sharing some common code. Probably a good idea. Note that NBNS and DNS share some common code as well, given that NBNS was DNS-influenced but isn't the same as DNS.
Powered by MHonArc 2.6.10