[ethereal-dev] Re:

[Richard Sharpe <sharpe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At 12:23 PM 7/5/99 -0400, Jeffrey Perry <j.perry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Yes, one comment. I think this is the right approach, I would suggest
>taking it one step farther though. If you build the parser into 
>ethereal, then no recompiles would be needed for adding a new
>protocol. This is how Etherpeek on Windows works.

Hmmm, does anyone have a description of the language that Etherpeek uses? I
need some ideas on what is needed ...

>> Hi,
>> 
>> I wanted to discuss my progress as far as generating code for decode
>> modules is concerned, and seek some input and discussion.


Regards
-------
Richard Sharpe, sharpe@xxxxxxxxxx, NS Computer Software and Services P/L,
Samba (Team member www.samba.org), Ethereal (Team member www.zing.org)
Co-author, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours