> Right - so you still end up doubling your code. By "code" do you mean "lines of code the programmer types" or "bytes of code+data in the executable"? > No, not really. Let me clarify - I'm thinking of two different > mechanisms here: > > 1) Match Selected *Field*: This will use the new filtering mechanism > and will basically be a shorthand for a filter expression. Of course, > this won't work on HF_DEFAULT fields. > > 2) Match Selected *Bytes* (which is what we support today). Which of those two would the folks who wanted the "Match Selected" operator want?
Powered by MHonArc 2.6.10